{"id":1213,"date":"2013-11-18T09:26:24","date_gmt":"2013-11-18T14:26:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/?p=1213"},"modified":"2020-09-09T13:36:43","modified_gmt":"2020-09-09T17:36:43","slug":"proposals-for-modifications-to-wtdc-resolutions-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/2013\/11\/18\/proposals-for-modifications-to-wtdc-resolutions-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Proposals for Modifications to WTDC Resolutions"},"content":{"rendered":"

———- Forwarded message ———-
\nFrom: Seth Johnson
\nDate: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:26 AM
\nSubject: Re: [ITAC-D] Proposals for MODS to Hyderabad Resolutions
\nTo: “Minard, Julian E” , “ITAC-D@LMLIST.STATE.GOV”
\nCc: Julian Minard <\/p>\n

Some mods attached; think I will get the rest in today. There’s a synthetic overview that you’ll be seeing soon as well.
\nWTDC 30 – ID Edits<\/a>
\nWTDC 13 – ID Edits<\/a>
\nWTDC 63 – ID Edits<\/a>
\nWTDC 45 – ID Edits<\/a><\/p>\n

Seth<\/p>\n

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Seth Johnson wrote:
\n> Hi Julian: keep in mind my input. I have had to prioritize
\n> resolutions to address the WTDC, and the US Delegation’s approach to
\n> it, in a systematic way.
\n>
\n> Among WTDC resolutions I have mentioned, following WTDC 47 and 23
\n> (conformance and interoperability and international internet
\n> connectivity) I would place the following, which require important
\n> clarifications in important contexts:
\n>
\n> WTDC 13 and 30, maybe edits to 52 and 71 in line with those as well
\n> (to clarify regarding vertical integration), followed by WTDC 64
\n> (consumer protection) and WTDC 20 (non-discrimination).
\n>
\n> (WTDC 43, on IMT, does not require mods because it does not use the
\n> general term broadband, but I naturally rank it High along with
\n> Conformance and Interoperability, just as the US does, because of the
\n> IAP study question on broadband associated with it).
\n>
\n> At the last meeting I also mentioned a set of WTDC resolutions
\n> important for their treatment of identifiers: These are WTDC 22, which
\n> only refers to NGNs in that connection, and WTDC 63, which only refers
\n> to IP-based networks in that connection. WTDC 45 also refers to
\n> cryptographic research that connects with the identifiers concern.
\n>
\n> The rest of the WTDC Resolutions have mostly trivial issues with
\n> terminology, such as a weird reference to an ICT device in WTDC 37
\n> (digital divide) and WTDC 58 and 70 (persons with disabilities), which
\n> are not misleading though they refer to the Internet extensively.
\n> WTDC 45 has a similar trivial terminology issue, and I had set it
\n> aside, but I consider revisions to it important because of the
\n> identifiers issue.
\n>
\n> Almost all the WTDC resolutions are framed in terms of the indefinite
\n> terms ICTs or telecommunications\/ICTs. This use of language is only
\n> misleading when considered in the overall context. I do have an
\n> entirely new concern regarding WTDC 15, which I will raise separately.
\n>
\n>
\n> Seth
\n>
\n> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Minard, Julian E wrote:
\n>> Apparently I neglected to send this out. Please take a look at this list of
\n>> Resolutions from the perspective of (a) identifying those that you consider
\n>> to be of high priority (some, but maybe not all, have been already
\n>> identified), and (b) identifying the MODs you consider important to you
\n>> (giving due consideration to those that are high priority). The leads have
\n>> been identified, some by name, others by organization. Leads are only
\n>> expected to lead the work, and need not do everything on their own.
\n>>
\n>> The list also reminds that we had agreed that there would be talking points
\n>> on the DIAPs; we have not seen much activity on this part of the project.
\n>>
\n>> At the next TDAG\/WTDC prep meeting (this Tuesday), we will be replacing
\n>> organizational identities with real names, and then we can do the real work
\n>> of proposing MODs.
\n>>
\n>> Julian Minard<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

———- Forwarded message ———- From: Seth Johnson Date: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:26 AM Subject: Re: [ITAC-D] Proposals for MODS to Hyderabad Resolutions To: “Minard, Julian E” , “ITAC-D@LMLIST.STATE.GOV” Cc: Julian Minard Some mods attached; think I will get the rest in today. There’s a synthetic overview that you’ll be seeing soon as well. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1213"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1840,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1213\/revisions\/1840"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internetdistinction.com\/wsisimpacts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}