Recognizing WSIS Impacts
- Synopsis of the Opinion
- Supporters Letter
- Statements
- WSIS
- Geneva Plan of Action
- ITU Plenipotentiary Conferences
- PP 2010 – Guadalajara, Mexico
- PP Resolution 2
- PP Resolution 21
- PP Resolution 22
- PP Resolution 23
- PP Resolution 24
- PP Resolution 25
- PP Resolution 30
- PP Resolution 31
- PP Resolution 34
- PP Resolution 35
- PP Resolution 36
- PP Resolution 58
- PP Resolution 64
- PP Resolution 70
- PP Resolution 71
- PP Resolution 73
- PP Resolution 100
- PP Resolution 101
- PP Resolution 102
- PP Resolution 112
- PP Resolution 113
- PP Resolution 122
- PP Resolution 123
- PP Resolution 124
- PP Resolution 128
- PP Resolution 129
- PP Resolution 130
- PP Resolution 131
- PP Resolution 133
- PP Resolution 135
- PP Resolution 136
- PP Resolution 137
- PP Resolution 138
- PP Resolution 139
- PP Resolution 140
- PP Resolution 143
- PP Resolution 149
- PP Resolution 157
- PP Resolution 169
- PP Resolution 170
- PP Resolution 172
- PP Resolution 174
- PP Resolution 175
- PP Resolution 177
- PP Resolution 178
- PP Resolution 179
- PP Resolution 180
- PP Resolution 181
- PP Resolution 182
- PP Resolution 183
- PP Resolution 184
- PP 2014 – Busan, Republic of Korea
- PP Resolution 2
- PP Resolution 21
- PP Resolution 58
- PP Resolution 64
- PP Resolution 70
- PP Resolution 71
- PP Resolution 101
- PP Resolution 102
- PP Resolution 123
- PP Resolution 130
- PP Resolution 131
- PP Resolution 133
- PP Resolution 135
- PP Resolution 137
- PP Resolution 139
- PP Resolution 140
- PP Resolution 157
- PP Resolution 162
- PP Resolution 174
- PP Resolution 177
- PP Resolution 180
- PP Resolution 185
- PP Resolution 187
- PP Resolution 188
- PP Resolution 189
- PP Resolution 190
- PP Resolution 191
- PP Resolution 195
- PP Resolution 196
- PP Resolution 197
- PP Resolution 199
- PP Resolution 200
- PP Resolution 201
- PP Resolution 203
- PP 2010 – Guadalajara, Mexico
- World Telecommunications Development Conferences
- WTDC 2010 – Hyderabad, India
- WTDC Resolution 5
- WTDC Resolution 7
- WTDC Resolution 8
- WTDC Resolution 11
- WTDC Resolution 13
- WTDC Resolution 15
- WTDC Resolution 16
- WTDC Resolution 17
- WTDC Resolution 20
- WTDC Resolution 21
- WTDC Resolution 22
- WTDC Resolution 23
- WTDC Resolution 24
- WTDC Resolution 30
- WTDC Resolution 31
- WTDC Resolution 32
- WTDC Resolution 34
- WTDC Resolution 35
- WTDC Resolution 36
- WTDC Resolution 37
- WTDC Resolution 38
- WTDC Resolution 39
- WTDC Resolution 40
- WTDC Resolution 44
- WTDC Resolution 45
- WTDC Resolution 46
- WTDC Resolution 47
- WTDC Resolution 48
- WTDC Resolution 50
- WTDC Resolution 52
- WTDC Resolution 53
- WTDC Resolution 54
- WTDC Resolution 55
- WTDC Resolution 56
- WTDC Resolution 58
- WTDC Resolution 59
- WTDC Resolution 62
- WTDC Resolution 63
- WTDC Resolution 64
- WTDC Resolution 65
- WTDC Resolution 66
- WTDC Resolution 67
- WTDC Resolution 68
- WTDC Resolution 69
- WTDC Resolution 70
- WTDC Resolution 71
- WTDC Resolution 72
- WTDC Resolution 73
- WTDC Resolution 74
- WTDC 2014 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- WTDC Resolution 22
- WTDC Resolution 23
- WTDC Resolution 30
- WTDC Resolution 37
- WTDC Resolution 40
- WTDC Resolution 43
- WTDC Resolution 45
- WTDC Resolution 50
- WTDC Resolution 54
- WTDC Resolution 63
- WTDC Resolution 64
- WTDC Resolution 69
- WTDC Resolution 73
- WTDC Resolution 77
- WTDC Resolution 78
- WTDC Resolution 79
- WTDC Resolution 80
- WTDC Resolution 82
- WTDC 2010 – Hyderabad, India
- World Telecommunications Standards Assemblies
- WTSA 2012 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- WTSA Resolution 1
- WTSA Resolution 7
- WTSA Resolution 17
- WTSA Resolution 20
- WTSA Resolution 22
- WTSA Resolution 29
- WTSA Resolution 33
- WTSA Resolution 43
- WTSA Resolution 44
- WTSA Resolution 45
- WTSA Resolution 47
- WTSA Resolution 48
- WTSA Resolution 49
- WTSA Resolution 50
- WTSA Resolution 52
- WTSA Resolution 53
- WTSA Resolution 54
- WTSA Resolution 55
- WTSA Resolution 56
- WTSA Resolution 57
- WTSA Resolution 58
- WTSA Resolution 59
- WTSA Resolution 64
- WTSA Resolution 69
- WTSA Resolution 70
- WTSA Resolution 73
- WTSA Resolution 74
- WTSA Resolution 75
- WTSA Resolution 76
- WTSA 2012 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Archive for September, 2013
Broadband: Revisions to Study Question
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on September 23, 2013
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Seth Johnson <[protected]>
Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [ITAC-D] Contri. on Work at ITU-D to increase Broadband Access
To: Flavia Alves <[protected]>
Cc: “[protected]” <[protected]>
Hi Flavia, et al.,
Please find edits to the dIAP on promoting broadband and continuing relevant questions.
Broadband Study Question – ID Edits
The main concern is the way this proposal enables the kind of framework developed for wireless in the IMT standards, to be conflated with “broadband” in general.
Seth
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Flavia Alves <[protected]> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> Per our last call, I am sending the two contributions on the work related to
> Broadband Access:
>
>
> 1. Changes to the Resolutions on BB: I have comments to 3 out of the 6
> resolutions from WTDC-10 that directly or indirectly relates to broadband
> access. I made comments to the ones related to Question 25/2. If anyone
> wants to provide edits to the rest of the resolutions, I will be happy to
> receive and compile them for the group, but I have no input on them.
>
> 2. Continuance of SQ 25/2: The contribution proposes that Question 25
> continues, but with greater coordination with other related Study Questions,
> and the BDT. It also includes an annex with the proposed changes by the
> Rapporteur of the SQs, Amy Sanders, and some other changes included by me
> aiming for greater linkage with related Study Questions and the BDT.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Flavia
Conformance and Interoperability: Revisions to WTDC 47
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on September 23, 2013
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Seth Johnson <[protected]>
Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:51 PM
Subject: WTDC 47 Edits – Re: [ITAC-D] Updated proposal for changes to WTDC Resolution 47 on Conformance & Interoperability
To: “Chip Sharp (chsharp)” <[protected]>
Cc: “[protected]” <[protected]>
Hi Chip et al.,
Edits to WTDC 47 attached, as promised.
WTDC 47 – ID Edits
Seth
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Sharp (chsharp) <[protected]> wrote:
> All,
>
> As requested today, here is the proposed modification for Resolution 47.
> Note that this is Rev 4 of the proposal, but the only difference from the
> last one I sent out is one word (highlighted). It is diffmarked against the
> current version of Resolution 47.
>
> I recommend reviewing all the proposed changes, but I want to bring to your
> attention two additions to the Resolution:
> * Addition of text on counterfeit equipment, as per Res. 177 of PP’10.
> * Addition of text related to MRAs
>
>
> The inclusion of counterfeit equipment was the result of discussions (e.g.,
> at TSAG) on whether this work should be done in ITU-T or in ITU-D. The
> intent of adding counterfeit into Res 47 is to try to move this work to
> capacity building in ITU-D as opposed to ITU-T developing Recommendations.
>
> The addition of text on MRAs to Res. 47 was intended to refer to capacity
> building on MRAs, (e.g, what MRAs are, how they are developed, how they
> work), *not* to negotiate MRAs. There seems to be a lot of confusion about
> MRAs and how they work (including me).
>
> For those that are interested, the following ITU-D web site describes the
> activities related to the C&I Program.
> As I noted on the call, the ITU(-D) is already including MRAs in its work
> including developing guidelines for development of MRAs.
> http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Technology/Pages/ConformanceandInteroperability.aspx
>
> I also noted on the call that the ITU has signed MOUs related to the C&I
> Program with test labs in countries that have local testing requirements
> (don’t accept test results from the US).
>
> Chip Sharp
> Director – Tech Policy & Internet Governance
> Cary, NC
Conformance and Interoperability: Revisions and Rapporteur Nomination
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on September 4, 2013
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Seth Johnson <[protected]>
Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM
Subject: Rapporteur Nomination — Re: [ITAC-D] Proposed New Question on Conformance & Interoperability
To: “[protected]” <[protected]>, “Chip Sharp (chsharp)” <[protected]>, Doreen McGirr <[protected]>, “Zichy, Franz J” <[protected]>
Cc: Bruce Perens <[protected]>, Roxanne McElvane <[protected]>, Julian Minard <[protected]>
Hello all —
I was able with some of the folks I work with to find a Rapporteur for the Conformance and Interoperability Question. Please find a set of revisions to the Question attached.
Conformance & Interoperability Study Question – ID Edits
We offer a nomination for Bruce Perens to play this role. He is cc’d here.
Seth Johnson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Chip Sharp (chsharp) <[protected]> wrote:
>
>
> C-315 was submitted by the SG2 Chair (Algeria Telecom) to ITU-D SG2 and proposes a new question on Conformance and Interoperability.
> http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=en&parent=D10-SG02-C-0315
>
>
> I had circulated a draft of a new Question on C&I earlier, but I understand that not everyone has seen it. I based this proposal on the proposal submitted by the US to WTDC’10 (but dropped during the meeting).
>
> I’m attaching it to this email.
>
>