Recognizing WSIS Impacts
- Synopsis of the Opinion
- Supporters Letter
- Statements
- WSIS
- Geneva Plan of Action
- ITU Plenipotentiary Conferences
- PP 2010 – Guadalajara, Mexico
- PP Resolution 2
- PP Resolution 21
- PP Resolution 22
- PP Resolution 23
- PP Resolution 24
- PP Resolution 25
- PP Resolution 30
- PP Resolution 31
- PP Resolution 34
- PP Resolution 35
- PP Resolution 36
- PP Resolution 58
- PP Resolution 64
- PP Resolution 70
- PP Resolution 71
- PP Resolution 73
- PP Resolution 100
- PP Resolution 101
- PP Resolution 102
- PP Resolution 112
- PP Resolution 113
- PP Resolution 122
- PP Resolution 123
- PP Resolution 124
- PP Resolution 128
- PP Resolution 129
- PP Resolution 130
- PP Resolution 131
- PP Resolution 133
- PP Resolution 135
- PP Resolution 136
- PP Resolution 137
- PP Resolution 138
- PP Resolution 139
- PP Resolution 140
- PP Resolution 143
- PP Resolution 149
- PP Resolution 157
- PP Resolution 169
- PP Resolution 170
- PP Resolution 172
- PP Resolution 174
- PP Resolution 175
- PP Resolution 177
- PP Resolution 178
- PP Resolution 179
- PP Resolution 180
- PP Resolution 181
- PP Resolution 182
- PP Resolution 183
- PP Resolution 184
- PP 2014 – Busan, Republic of Korea
- PP Resolution 2
- PP Resolution 21
- PP Resolution 58
- PP Resolution 64
- PP Resolution 70
- PP Resolution 71
- PP Resolution 101
- PP Resolution 102
- PP Resolution 123
- PP Resolution 130
- PP Resolution 131
- PP Resolution 133
- PP Resolution 135
- PP Resolution 137
- PP Resolution 139
- PP Resolution 140
- PP Resolution 157
- PP Resolution 162
- PP Resolution 174
- PP Resolution 177
- PP Resolution 180
- PP Resolution 185
- PP Resolution 187
- PP Resolution 188
- PP Resolution 189
- PP Resolution 190
- PP Resolution 191
- PP Resolution 195
- PP Resolution 196
- PP Resolution 197
- PP Resolution 199
- PP Resolution 200
- PP Resolution 201
- PP Resolution 203
- PP 2010 – Guadalajara, Mexico
- World Telecommunications Development Conferences
- WTDC 2010 – Hyderabad, India
- WTDC Resolution 5
- WTDC Resolution 7
- WTDC Resolution 8
- WTDC Resolution 11
- WTDC Resolution 13
- WTDC Resolution 15
- WTDC Resolution 16
- WTDC Resolution 17
- WTDC Resolution 20
- WTDC Resolution 21
- WTDC Resolution 22
- WTDC Resolution 23
- WTDC Resolution 24
- WTDC Resolution 30
- WTDC Resolution 31
- WTDC Resolution 32
- WTDC Resolution 34
- WTDC Resolution 35
- WTDC Resolution 36
- WTDC Resolution 37
- WTDC Resolution 38
- WTDC Resolution 39
- WTDC Resolution 40
- WTDC Resolution 44
- WTDC Resolution 45
- WTDC Resolution 46
- WTDC Resolution 47
- WTDC Resolution 48
- WTDC Resolution 50
- WTDC Resolution 52
- WTDC Resolution 53
- WTDC Resolution 54
- WTDC Resolution 55
- WTDC Resolution 56
- WTDC Resolution 58
- WTDC Resolution 59
- WTDC Resolution 62
- WTDC Resolution 63
- WTDC Resolution 64
- WTDC Resolution 65
- WTDC Resolution 66
- WTDC Resolution 67
- WTDC Resolution 68
- WTDC Resolution 69
- WTDC Resolution 70
- WTDC Resolution 71
- WTDC Resolution 72
- WTDC Resolution 73
- WTDC Resolution 74
- WTDC 2014 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- WTDC Resolution 22
- WTDC Resolution 23
- WTDC Resolution 30
- WTDC Resolution 37
- WTDC Resolution 40
- WTDC Resolution 43
- WTDC Resolution 45
- WTDC Resolution 50
- WTDC Resolution 54
- WTDC Resolution 63
- WTDC Resolution 64
- WTDC Resolution 69
- WTDC Resolution 73
- WTDC Resolution 77
- WTDC Resolution 78
- WTDC Resolution 79
- WTDC Resolution 80
- WTDC Resolution 82
- WTDC 2010 – Hyderabad, India
- World Telecommunications Standards Assemblies
- WTSA 2012 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- WTSA Resolution 1
- WTSA Resolution 7
- WTSA Resolution 17
- WTSA Resolution 20
- WTSA Resolution 22
- WTSA Resolution 29
- WTSA Resolution 33
- WTSA Resolution 43
- WTSA Resolution 44
- WTSA Resolution 45
- WTSA Resolution 47
- WTSA Resolution 48
- WTSA Resolution 49
- WTSA Resolution 50
- WTSA Resolution 52
- WTSA Resolution 53
- WTSA Resolution 54
- WTSA Resolution 55
- WTSA Resolution 56
- WTSA Resolution 57
- WTSA Resolution 58
- WTSA Resolution 59
- WTSA Resolution 64
- WTSA Resolution 69
- WTSA Resolution 70
- WTSA Resolution 73
- WTSA Resolution 74
- WTSA Resolution 75
- WTSA Resolution 76
- WTSA 2012 – Dubai, United Arab Emirates
WTDC Resolution 52
WTDC RESOLUTION 52 (Rev. Hyderabad, 2010)
Strengthening the executing agency role of the ITU Telecommunication Development Sector
The World Telecommunication Development Conference (Hyderabad, 2010),
- recalling
- a)Resolution 52 (Doha, 2006) of the World Telecommunication Development Conference;
- b)Resolution 135 (Antalya, 2006) of the Plenipotentiary Conference, on ITU participation in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other programmes of the United Nations system,
- considering
- a)that, in accordance with No. 118 of the ITU Constitution, one of the functions of the ITU Telecommunication Development Sector (ITU-D) is to discharge the Union’s dual responsibility as a United Nations specialized agency and executing agency for implementing projects under the United Nations development system or other funding arrangements, so as to facilitate and enhance projects related to information and communication technology (ICT) by offering, organizing and coordinating technical cooperation and assistance activities;
- b)that the World Summit on the Information society (WSIS) recognized the key role that ITU can play in executing many of the projects pursuant to the WSIS outcomes;
- c)that, through initiatives ofthe Telecommunication Development Bureau (BDT) and the regional offices, and some other efforts, including partnerships, there is significant local expertise that has developed over time;
- d)that partnerships between the public and private sectors are recognized as an efficient way of implementing sustainable ITU projects,
- recognizing
- a)that the final outputs of the WSIS process have an impact on the definition of the future activities of ITU in general and ITU-D in particular;
- b)that the Plenipotentiary Conference (Antalya, 2006) adopted resolutions on ITU’s role in the implementation of and follow-up to the GenevaPlan of Action, emphasizing that any follow-up actions should be undertaken within the context of the Union’s core competencies and within the financial and human resources available, and that the next plenipotentiary conference will update these resolutions on the role of ITU in implementing the Geneva Plan of Action,
- noting
- that the Director of the BDT continues to emphasize that the following principles should be applied during the operational planning process:
- – focusing on development issues of a strategic nature;
- – reducing the fragmentation ofITU-D activities, particularly at the country level, by integrating them into long-term projects and activities aimed at addressing issues that have the potential to exert significant impact on the development process;
- – continuing to build effective partnerships around specific projects and long-term activities, particularly in relation to the initiatives adopted by the six regions;
- – using, to the greatest extent possible, the professional potential of BDT staff for project implementation in the ITU central administration and regional offices;
- – implementing a team-based project approach,
- taking into account
- a)the continued implementation ofresults-based budgeting in ITU,the main feature of which is the identification of costs, expected results, performance indicators and priorities presented within the framework of well-defined outputs (defined asSector or intersectoral products or services provided by ITU),
- b)the continued clear linkage between the strategic plan and financial plan for 2012-2015, and between strategic and operational planning, financial planning and budgeting, i.e. linking objectives, outputs, activities, expected results, performance indicators and priorities,
- resolves to instruct the Director ofthe Telecommunication Development Bureau
- on the basis of experience acquired in implementing Resolution 52 (Doha, 2006), the contents of Resolutions 135 (Antalya, 2006) and 139 (Antalya, 2006) of the Plenipotentiary Conference and other relevant resolutions,
- 1 to recognize the various benefits of involving locally available expertise, in the region and the country, as the case may be, in executing ITU projects in their region or country, and to stress the involvement of this expertise in the relevant ITU-D projects;
- 2 to standardize suitable methods and principles in the Hyderabad Action Plan, encouraging their definition and best practices for implementing the initiatives for the six regions, in the capacity of executing agency;
- 3 to ensure that, as far as possible, support costs and expenses borne by ITU-D in respect of project implementation under UNDP arrangements orother agreed financing arrangements are recovered;
- 4 to continue to conclude partnerships withMember States, Sector Members, financial institutions and international and regional organizations in order tofinance activities pertaining to implementation of this resolution.
- NOTE – When implementing this resolution, the updating of Resolution 135 (Antalya, 2006) by the next Plenipotentiary Conference (Guadalajara, 2010) will have to be taken into consideration.
- No comments yet.